Impact of stakeholder management in the construction industry

Impact of stakeholder instruction in the formulation patienceINTRODUCTIONThis percentage of the announce covers publications by several informants. A literature detailed re clear gives an overview of what has been said in the atomic number 18a of redact stakeholders and throw off victor , who the fundamental writers argon, what are the prevailing theories and hypotheses, what questions are being asked and what methods and methodologies are appropriate and effectual (Emerald, 2010).This chapter seeks to investigate the take up of stakeholder supervisement and its contributions to labor movement conquest in the social organisation sedulousness. Using the literature review mind chromo nearly useping in digit 2 on a lower floor, this report will explore linguistic rules and concepts on the subject bailiwick to satisfy its main objectives. pick up 1- Literature review mind map(Author)This literature review will satisfy the following support objectivesTo exp lore the principles of stakeholder solicitude and check success.To appreciate the benefits and ch allenges of stakeholder focusing.To correlate a relationship among stakeholder instruction and undertaking success.To propose a framework for bar the impact of stakeholder attention on see to it success thereby assessing its impact on dispatch success.To make recommendations for improved stakeholder oversight practices.Overview of the UK Construction exertionThe defecateion industry in the past 30 years has continued to spr by and expand (PMI 2008) and although motleys within the industry are relatively slow (Kagioglou et al 1998), mavin sight non overlook what the construction industry has contributed to the UK economy (Bennett 2003 p.7).The UK construction industry is the sixth largest industry in the UK in foothold of turnover (Adamson and Pollington 2006) and it depicts for 10% of the UKs GDP and employs 1.5 million tribe (Corporate Watch 2002). Recent studie s much(prenominal) as Walker (2007 p.101) has shown that theConstruction plow too has a challenging and full of smell task in defining and implementing the stakeholders requirements.This study considered this to be paramount. This was further asseverate by McElroy and mill (2007 p.758) clearly explaining the splendor of stakeholder management. This report would discuss stakeholder management in the next section.Overview of regard StakeholderA review of assorted literature and study on see to it stakeholder begs an explanation as to the origin of the discussion stakeholder. The word stakeholder was first recorded in text in 1708 tally to (Ramirez 1999) from the word stake. Although the definition of a learn stakeholder whitethorn remain baffling (Walker 2007 p.100), There is no consensus as to a common and widely use definition (McElroy and Mills 2007 p.760). It may be suggested that each author repairs stakeholder(s) to crusade the aim of individual academic interr ogation at that particular time. infra are some definitions of a design stakeholder from various literatures.Vollans (2006 p.50-15) defines a hear stakeholder as aperson or organisation with vested interest (positive or negative) in the ultimate outcome of the interpret.According to Olanda and Landin (2005 p.321) it isa group of people who provoke vested interest in the success of a depict and the surroundings within which the bear operates.While give management for development organizations (PM4DV) (2009 p.71) suggested that stakeholders arepeople who have an interest in the show, whose satisfaction is the about unfavorable element to define the success of a jutting.Other definitions include the ApmBok (2006 p.159) which defines vomit up stakeholders asall those who have an interest or role in the spue or are impacted by the reckon.For the purpose of this report an alternative definition would be suggested, this definition would incorporate various definitions as se en above. suffer stakeholders areGroup(s) of people /Organisation who have an interest in and who advise also impact a hold positively or negatively within the retch life pass and whose satisfactions are the most critical element to define the success of a support. (Olanda and Landin 2005 realise management for development organizations 2009 Apm Bok 2006 Vollans 2006)Projects are made of different stakeholders with different interest in the project. This study would look at the different types of stakeholder next.Types of stakeholdersWhen considering stakeholders types, it could be suggested that person or organisation is not self sufficient hence the word internationalisation came into being projects consist of various stakeholders. This can be seen in studies undertaken by Aaltonen and Sivonen (2009 p.132), where the author suggested that attaining the various stakeholders in a project involves taking into account their wants and requirement. Project stakeholders as ide ntify by Kloppenborg (2009) Aaltonen and Sivonen (2009) are carve up into immanent and external stakeholders. This can further be subdivided into capital and secondary stakeholders.Identifying some(prenominal) the radical and secondary stakeholders will overhaul the project autobus corroborate the project requirements and expectations, where the expectation is critical to project success (Kloppenborg 2009 p.362). This expectation is divided into three aspects relationship, conversations and lessons learnt. Aaltonen and Sivonen (2009 p.132) defined internal stakeholders asthose who are actively involved in the project implementation and this category of stakeholders usually animation the project.The author also inferred that internal stakeholders are also called primary Stakeholders. Examples of primary stakeholders are the project owner, project sponsor and project conductor. It could thence be assumed that Stakeholder Participation specifically by primary stakeholder wi ll accession the chances of success (Unruh 2005 p.413).While the external stakeholders aremembers of the project that may affect or be affected by the project Aaltonen and Sivonen (2009 p.132).These are a good deal called secondary stakeholders. Examples of secondary stakeholders are government agencies, suppliers and special interest groups. These classifications will be illustrated in a Figure 3 which shows the take of importance given to primary stakeholders belowFigure 2-Primary and secondary stakeholders(Author)Notwithstanding, neither primary nor secondary stakeholders can stand on its own given todays project environment. A typical sample of a primary stakeholder is the project manager who would not be qualified to proceed if the legislative requirements are not met, this could be in form of risk management system coiffure in place on the construction site. These requirements are set by the government bodies in charge of monitor and control, they are also cognize as t he secondary stakeholders.Principles of stakeholder managementDuring its years of development, stakeholder management has documented much(prenominal) success than failures in the eye socket of project management (Aaltonen and Sivonen 2009). Due to the several(a) nature of this subject matter, stakeholder principle and theories have been sought in subject and inter internal policies (Reed 2008). Examples of such success can be seen in research done by Narayan (2007) on Fiji Sugar Corporation because sugar is the major(ip) source of income of Fiji, the presence of m whatever stakeholders in the cooperation is evident but it can also be argued that the effectiveness of the management of all stakeholders present in the cooperation was delineate to the organisations success.Atkin and Skitmore (2008 p.549) have suggested that project management in the constructions industry has a complex collection of activities required to deliver a construction project. It is therefore conclusive that stakeholder management within the project lifecycle is critical for the success of any construction project. Thus failure of a project manager to manage the concerns of a construction project stakeholder over the years has resulted in a countless number of construction project failures (Atkin and Skitmore 2008 Bourne and Walker, 2005). It must also be noted that stakeholder in the construction industry have the talent to terminate a construction project (Atkin and Skitmore 2008 Lim et al. 2005).A report to the hall of Commons by the Committee of Public Accounts (2004) on the issues of Wembley stadium has shown that unretentive planning in the world phase of the project lifecycle has lead to stakeholder conflict. Managing stakeholders from the initiation phase of a construction project or any project is essential. Where there is effective stakeholder management, benefits are realised at the end of the project on time, within budget and case.Due to suggestions made in the previous(prenominal) section by Walker (2007) and McElroy and Mills (2007) that the term stakeholder is difficult to identify, defining stakeholder management will still pose the same difficulty identified by the above authors.Stakeholder Management can be defined asas the continuing development of relationships with stakeholders for the purpose of achieving a successful project outcome (McElroy and Mills 2007 p.760)It could be suggested that for stakeholder management to be successful, it must be strategic various literatures have suggested a bidding called the Stakeholder management turn this approach is applicable to both internal and external stakeholder (OGC 2010),the stakeholder process(McElroy and Mills 2007 p.772)are listed below and represented in the figure below realization of project success criteria.Identification of Resources Requirement.Identify Stakeholders and level of interestConduct stakeholder analytic thinkingDevelop Strategy for Each Stakeholder identified.T able Stakeholder Process ExplanationIdentification of project success criteriaMcElroy and Mills (2007) suggested that sponsors success criteria should be in terms of time, cost and performance.Identify Resource RequirementResource requirement mayhap classified as tangible item which could include materials and finance (Burke 2007) and intangible choice such as support and emotions (McElroy and Mills 2007). For a project to be successful it could be suggested that a project manager exigency access to all this resources both tangible and intangible.Identify Stakeholders and interest LevelsTo identify project stakeholders McElroy and Mills (2007) have suggested that brainstorming key stakeholders and recording all stakeholders and there level of interest into a stakeholder register.To Conduct Stakeholder AnalysisStakeholder view varies from one person to an otherwise. Some maybe in support and some in electric resistance of the project . Using a stakeholder commitment map the proj ect team will be able perform a more effective assessment of current attitude of each stakeholder during the lifecycle phases. McElroy and Mills (2007)Develop Strategy for each StakeholderAfter a stakeholder analysis has been carried out, the project team can build its strategies from the analysis. Such strategies can be the communication plan this would include all the methods of communication to be used and frequence of the communication between the project team and project stakeholders.Stakeholder Management and Project LifecycleThe body of knowledge in project management (PMBOK) have suggested thatBecause projects are unique and involve a certain degree of risk, companies such as the construction industry will generally subdivide their projects into several project phases to provide better management controlStakeholder management could be relate to project lifecycle, according to McManus (2004). Jawahar and Mclaughlin (2004) suggested thatat any given stage in the project lif ecycle certain stakeholders will be more important than otherTurner (2007) suggested the following phases the definition phase where the initial objectives are defined by various stakeholder the design phase according to Turner (2007) would be the matching the objectives with resources the execution phase, would involve implementation of the actual work and monitoring and controlling of the project by key stakeholders which also include the project manager and finally the closeout phase involves the commissioning and hand over to key stakeholder.Belout and Gauvreau (2003) suggested thatthe effect of the critical factors on success varies as the project cycle stages changeThis can be seen in Figure used to striking criterias for success and lifecycle by Belout and Gauvreau (2003) this is illustrated in the Figure below and can be linked to project success as seen belowFigure A Link Between Criterias for victor and LifecyclePROJECT SUCCESSThe word project success is an indefinite w ord to say the least this has lead to a set of definitions and perspectives by different professionals and academic in the field of project management. According to McManus (2004),The most successful projects always involve both govern and indirect stakeholders While Yu et al. (2005) suggests that aProjectis a success if its created intersection point adds value to the client, considering the cost to the client at the point of acceptanceIka (2009 p.6) suggested that project success be defined in terms of concepts such as efficiency and effectiveness, enmesh (2007 p.5) argues that project success should be defined utilise the three objectives listed belowProject Completion within the Budget.The project delivered or handed over to customer on time.Good performance, requiring all components of the project to meet the sponsors requirements.Source Lock (2007, p.5)The author is invariably suggesting that we use the project management triangle seen below in Figure 4 to fasten if a pro ject is successful.Figure 3- Success triangle by Lock 2007(Author)While Lock (2007) and Ika (2009) have presented various ways in which project stakeholders should be defined in the context of project management, Assudani and Kloppenborg (2010) have preferable to summarise their definition of project success in terms project stakeholders. It was suggested that for a project to be successful, it must meet the customers requirements and manage their relationships though effective communication. Accordingly Pinto (2004) went from the Iron triangle suggested by Lock (2007) in Figure 4 and linked it to the benefits gained by the organisation and the project stakeholder(s) at the completion of the project.In a study carried out by Sofia (2003) highborn project success in relation with organizational roles and project managers skills and capabilities, the author identified the following in Table 3Table 1- Project success definition, Source Sofia (2003)Definition Of Project SuccessPercen tageIt meets the scrape cost, schedule, quality and functionality88.5%It meet the customers satisfaction85.9%It creates organisational improvement with the learning from failures and successes (lessons learned)44.9%It was performed efficiently and efficaciously43.6%It succeeds in executing the desired changes because one cannot expect every project to proceed exactly as planned37.2Others7.7%The above table has indicated that studies carried out by Sofia (2003) are in accordance with Lock (2007) and Ika (2009) definitions. This report would define project success asThe satisfaction of stakeholders needs in teams of time, cost, and quality/performance (Lock 2007 Sofia (2003) Ika 2009 Assudani and Kloppenborg 2010 ApmBok 2009).The satisfaction mentioned in the above definition could be suggested to concoct the benefit realised at the handover phase of the project. Since projects are unique endeavours (ApmBok 2009), it is pay to suggest that satisfying stakeholders requirements vict imization the criterias set aside by the stakeholder should be what success should be eyeshaded against.Critical Success factor (CSFs) for construction projectsAchieving success is the goal of any project the construction industry is not different from other industries in achieving success (Yu et al.200). The Apm Bok (2009, p.2) suggested that to satisfy stakeholders, one must have measurable criteria (OGC 2010) to measure success. Since Construction projects have been identified as having issues such as lack of trust, lack of cooperation and ineffective communication which have lead to adversarial relationship among all project stakeholders (Chan et al.2004), partnering with various stakeholders and identifying their view on CSFs using questionnaires (Jing et al. 2010) is important because it gives the project manager a clear view of each stakeholder expectations. Milosevic and Patanakul (2005) suggested thatCritical success factors are correlated to a construct of an aggregate me asure ofproject successAccording (PMI 2008 Wang and Huang 2009)Project successcriteria shall include the golden triangle and keyproject stakeholders satisfaction of theprojectThe following CSFs have been identified from literature and can be utilize in the construction industry (Yu et al. 2004 Lock 2007 Hill et al., 2008), these CSFs are listed belowClear and agreed upon objective.Project requirement must be wieldfully thought out.Trusting relationship between all members of the project retain from top managementAvailability of sufficient funds and other resourceTechnical competence with the project team.Good communicationBenefits and Challenges of Stakeholder ManagementStakeholder management has both benefits and challenges to construction organisations which are determined by the role vie by each stakeholder organisation during the execution of project (Zutshi and Sohal 2002, p.371).The benefits of effective stakeholder management can be linked to an organisation or a countrys pecuniary success (Zutshi and Sohal 2002 Reed et al 2009). Since the construction industry is copious with a sizeable number of stakeholders across the political, social, cultural and economic sector (Moodley et al.2008), identifying those benefits and challenges approach by the construction industry will be a antecedency for any project manager.BenefitsThe benefits of stakeholders in the construction industry are explored below thusStakeholder AnalysisVollans (2002 p.50-15) suggested that a key benefit of stakeholder management is the principle of analysing stakeholder which simply put isa technique used to identify and assess the importance of stakeholdersGuarded with knowledge gained from analysing various project stakeholders, it could be inferred that the knowledge will be used to make judgement regarding how each stakeholder could help or hinder the project (McElroy and Mills 2007). This early assessment of stakeholders at the planning stage of the project life cycle would identify and improve quality (Vollans 2002) by increasing the level of support from stakeholders and reducing opposition (ApmBok 2009).By identifying each stakeholder and analysing their various interests it could be suggested that this would reduce conflict by resolving issues at an early stage of the project. This analysis must be reviewed throughout the project life cycle phase (ApmBok 2009).Monitoring and ensureMcElroy and Mills (2007) identified better monitoring and control as a benefit of effective stakeholder management. It is suggested that management of stakeholders with regards to their ever changing interest using project management tools such as change control process and configuration management in conjunction with stakeholder management theories, should enable the project manager manage changes (Zutshi 2004).In the area of cost management, stakeholder management has been able to reduce ambiguity, duplication and waste of resources as a result of conflicts and statu tory issues (Zutshi 2004 Atkinson 1999)Project GovernanceTurner (2007) have suggested thatProject are governed on behalf of stakeholders which includes owners and contractorsThe above author also suggested two paradigms of project governance as it relates to organisations. This paradigm suggests that projects are governed on behalf of all stakeholders, which will include both primary and secondary stakeholders. The author suggested that the responsibility of managing this relationship is that of the project manager and project team. This relationship will be managed using the principles of stakeholder management.ChallengesIn discussing challenges approach stakeholder management in the construction industry the following were identified globalisationCarson (2002) defined globalisation asa multidimensional process whereby subject resources become more and more internationally mobile while national economies become increasingly interdependentMoodley et al. (2004) in recent studies id entified globalisation as a challenge faced by the construction industry and argues that with the ever changing construction industry, recent issues that exists in stakeholder management such as (Communication and Scope Management ) falls within a global context. Since major construction companies in the world including UK construction companies undertake projects in various parts of the world (Steger 2003) and source for materials globally (Moodley et al. 2004), adopting stakeholder management principles and strategies from one region into a new region or culture may lead to failure due to gaps in culture and communication (Tone et al. 2009 p.27). An example of this can be seen in stakeholder management practices adopted during the construction of the Burj Al Arab in Dubai (reference).Effective Knowledge TransferSome professionals in project management discipline may refer to this as Lessons Leaned. The Ontario health care information (reference) described knowledge transfer as a p rocess of developing, identifying, and disseminating best practices, and planning, producing, disseminating, and applying existing or new research in stakeholder managementSenaratne and Sexton (2008) stressed the importance of sharing knowledge within the area of stakeholder management and also noted the role of knowledge in managing change in the construction industry. Egbu (2003) also went further to identify change as the key cause of knowledge production in construction projects. It could be suggested that though knowledge is been transferred in projects through journals in project management and the construction journals, key issues concerning individual project and stakeholder management issues and how this issues are refractory are still kept as confidential documents within various organisations resulting in a gap in the management of stakeholders within the construction sector.Organisational PolicyKamann (2007) suggested thatOrganizations usually adapt or adjust their obje ctives and strategy in order to minimize strategic driftThese objective and strategy may impact the project adversely (Aaltonen 2010), the stakeholder defines the scope of the work (ApmBok 2009), if this scope is change or strategy changed as suggested by Kamann (2007) on a ceaseless basis, the ApmBok (2009) has suggested that it would lead to what is known as a Scope Creep. The construction industry is known to be complex and full of different stakeholder with different level of power, the policy of organisation can either help to manage stakeholders more effectively or it may result in difference of filling and invariably conflict.2.7 Relationship between Stakeholder Management and Project SuccessA survey involving 109 professionals on how best to define project success, shows that 88.5% of respondents agreed that project success should be judged on the basis of cost, schedule, quality, functionality (Sofia 2003), the link between stakeholder management process and success cann ot be overemphasised (Bones 2007). McElroy and Mills (2007) illustrated the various stakeholder management processes to project success as seen in the figure below Project StakeholderSuccess CriteriaResources RequirementStakeholder IdentificationStakeholder AnalysisStakeholder StrategyProject Success(Author)Figure The Relationship between Stakeholder Management Project SuccessWhile (Wit 1988) suggested thatWhen measuring project success, one must consider the objectives of all stakeholders throughout the project life cycle and at all levels in the management power structureThe above author also suggested thatit is unlikely that a project can be a complete success for all stakeholders during the entire life of the projectThe above statement is reinforced by Aaltonen et al. (2008) when the author proposed critical success factors for stakeholder management in the construction industry. Although the depth of literature linking stakeholder management to project success in the construc tion industry is minimal, but a general literature into the link between stakeholder management and project success (McElroy and Mills 2007), the (ApmBok 2009 OGC 2010) suggested that to satisfy stakeholders, one must have measurable criteria to measure success.