Are Group Rights Justified? :: essays research papers fc

Are differentiating measures justified in the mark of a meeting justifiedly or interest or should they be condemned as violating the rights of individuals to exist treatment?It has been argued that differentiating measures that grant rights gooply to groups argon unsportsmanlike as they trespass on the individuals fundamental right to equal treatment. This essay seeks to prove that when applied in a sporty manner group rights can enhance the equality of treatment current by the individual.The notion that equal treatment is of vital importance and that divergence is immoral is widespread. The interpretation of equal treatment and discrimination however, is not . For some, equal treatment implies that each individual leave alone be treated in the exact manner all other individuals are treated. There should be no distinction made between race, sex, religion or verbiage in order to allow individuals receive preferential treatment because of their social rank of a certain gro up. Others argue that if each person is given precisely the same rights regardless of race, sex, religion or language then members of minorities are put at a disadvantage and equal treatment is impossible.In order to justify the entitlement of certain groups to exclusive rights it is important to define what the exclusive rights are. According to Baker these rights can be divided into two groups, those pertaining to intra-groups relations and those pertaining to inter group rights. The first type of rights involves relationships between group members and whitethorn lead to individual oppression. For example if a particular religious group were given the right to legally prohibit marriages of its members to non-members this would be unjust. Individual freedom, in such a case, would be subverted for the sake of solidarity. Intra groups rights can be precise treacherous to individual rights e particular(prenominal)ly in theocratic and patriarchal cultures where there is a huge dange r that women will be oppressed . Having ceremonious that intra-groups are potentially subversive and therefore undesirables the remainder of this essay will deal with inter group rights. Inter-group rights pertain to relationships between different groups. Inter-groups rights can, therefore, exclusively exist in a pluralist state. Such preferential treatment seeks to shelter a minority group against the larger society. The belief is that these rights will prescript out the unfair advantage members of the majority group may pretend over members of the minority and will prevent marginilisation and segregation of the minority . These special rights can take various forms.