.

Friday, December 6, 2013

Cja/354 Wk 1 Individual Paper

In the national regarding the FAA vs. cooper it is argued that make who is a slip away pilot and also happens to be human immunodeficiency virus controlling, failed to reveal his medical checkup condition to the federal official Aviation Administration. The argument is that part Cooper failed to disclose his HIV diagnosis, which he also employ for affable Security benefits and was approved for long term hindrance found on the item that he was HIV positive. In disposition to become a certified aviator, you must suck up a medical certificate. However, the FAA doesnt certify persons with HIV. It is noted that on some(prenominal) occasions, Cooper renewed his certificate with the FAA, but intention splatter ensembley withhold his condition. I found this article to be elicit because of the fact that the FAA is able to seclude people who are HIV positive from this line of work. Some would say this is discriminatory, but seeing how brisk it is to maintain ones healt h for a job that holds an huge bar of responsibility, it certainly makes sense. Another argument which is one that Cooper is exploitation against the FAA, the Department of Transportation, and the Social Security Administration is that they go against the hiding Act of 1974. Since the DOT, which is a parent company for the FAA, provided the SSA with names of pilots who had acquire SSA benefits.
Ordercustompaper.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!
One of the purposes of the criminal law related to the case is that it was cerebrate that the Government had violated this act but that it was unreadable as to the actual restitution. It was concluded that the act ual damages were intellectual and excited ! distress. The Privacy Act does not unequivoc all toldy croak damages for mental or emotional distress and hence does not waive the GovĂ‚¬ernments sovereign immunity from indebtedness for such(prenominal) harms. (2011) As for the sources related to the case; common-law, the Privacy Act of 1974, the federal official Aviation Administration, the Department of Transportation, and the Social Security Administration were all relevant sources pertaining to this case....If you want to get a full essay, discover it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.