Comparison of King Lear and Gloucester

English IV January 31, 2012 Love, and be silent As iodin of Shakespe ares around famous tragedies, the story of King Lear reflects the two extremes of benevolent nature-- erotic love and committedness, lies and betrayal. In such a building complex world, Shakespeare ironic solelyy contrasts the physical qualities to the darksomeer meanings of sightlessness and sight throughout the tragical lives of the King and Gloucester. Their lack of taste cause their hearts to be blinded by their deviant misgivings of love and trust at the early stages where they can relieve physically see; further it is also such cecity that helps King Lear and Gloucester to find their crystalize water visions back to detect the candor after deep self-realizations when the blindness reaches to its extreme. Both universe fathers and noble men, King Lear and Gloucester are fooled by the flattering wrangle which they are used to and debar the children who devote true love to them. It is unfair to say that they do not love those children, but their wrong physical body value caused by their special social status have essential a false understanding of real love and loyalty within their minds. As Lear says in front of all his people, [he] loves [Cordelia] some and thought to set [his] lie in/ On her kind nursery (1.1.

124-25), but when his pride takes everyplace his senses, such beefed-up love turns out to be surpassing expectations of apparent and mindless flattery from Cordelia. Physically being satisfactory to see all the praises and loyalties people has devoted to him, Lear yet has been g enuinely blinded in heart by his lack of ins! ight. nutriment in his admit world which full of lies and pretenses, the King loses his clear vision to determine what the reality is. Also misjudging the truth, Gloucester shows his weakness from accept in Edmund, the... If you emergency to get a full essay, piece it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper